Russia still dominates European pipelines
The Trans-Adriatic Pipeline is too small to make a strategic difference to European gas supplies, especially as Russian firms move to gain more control of Caspian energy exports, writes Audrey Dubois-Hebert, a researcher at Strategic Analysis
European officials were quick to announce their support for the Trans-Adriatic Pipeline (Tap) after it won the right to transport Azerbaijani gas to EU markets. Tap's selection by the consortium developing the Shah Deniz II gasfield project in the Caspian came at the expense of the EU's long-preferred option, the Nabucco project. But the consortium's logic was clear. Running 870 km westwards from the Greek-Turkish border - where it meets the Trans-Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline - to San Foca in Italy, Tap was chosen because it offered a shorter and more cost-efficient route. Designed to carry 10 billion cubic metres of gas per year (cm/y) and estimated to cost $3.2bn, Tap makes commercial se
Also in this section
23 April 2026
The addition of an oil pipeline to the Power of Siberia 2 gas project could ensure deliveries of Russian oil to China, materially shorten logistics lines between West Siberia and final customers, and—amid disruption in the Strait of Hormuz—offer a land-based export route that reduces exposure to maritime chokepoints
23 April 2026
There is a clear push to bolster exports to Asia amid uncertainty around its North American neighbour, but there are limits to the benefits from the energy crisis
23 April 2026
Shell made the play-opening discovery in Namibia’s Orange basin back in 2022, but its next well could decide whether the project can actually be commercialised
22 April 2026
The failure of OMV Petrom’s keenly watched exploration campaign at Bulgaria’s Han Asparuh block highlights the Black Sea’s uneven track record, despite major successes like Neptun Deep and Sakarya
