18 February 2014
Contradictions in US climate and energy policy
The latest developments in the tortuous Keystone XL pipeline review highlight the contradictions in US energy and climate change policies
As expected, the latest US government review of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline that would carry Canadian oil sands crude, along with some US light oil, to refineries in Texas, has concluded that the project would not unduly harm the environment. Yet this has done little to quell the controversy surrounding the proposed 830,000 barrels a day pipeline. The State Department’s latest environmental impact study concluded that not building the pipeline would report in little change to the current pattern of carbon emissions. On the other hand, not constructing the pipeline would lead to more oil being shipped by rail at greater risk to the general population due to the higher accident rate of t
Also in this section
2 April 2026
Alongside a rapid continued build-out of renewables, China’s latest five-year plan stresses the value of domestic hydrocarbon production for energy security and calls for increased Russian gas imports
2 April 2026
The government is taking important steps to revive domestic production, lift investment and benefit from the geopolitical crisis even if more needs to be done in the longer term
1 April 2026
Golden Pass’s startup offers QatarEnergy a timely boost but may also force a difficult choice between honouring disrupted contracts and capitalising on soaring spot LNG prices
1 April 2026
It is not a case of if or when, but the length and magnitude of economic damage from elevated oil prices
