Rising political interventions in oil and gas markets
From deglobalisation to potential shortages, policymakers must be mindful of the law of unintended consequences
The COVID-19 pandemic led to more government intervention in energy markets in economies across the globe. Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, state involvement—from sanctions to price caps—became even more intensive, upending global oil and gas flows, and not necessarily in ways desired or intended. Getting the right policy balance is at the heart of good energy policy. Examples of ‘bad’ government intervention are efforts to influence energy prices, often leading to adverse impacts. Attempts to cap prices fall into this category. Legislating limits to energy prices only leads to reduced incentive to provide more energy and encourages waste. Aggressive price freezes and caps can lead
Also in this section
16 January 2026
The country’s global energy importance and domestic political fate are interlocked, highlighting its outsized oil and gas powers, and the heightened fallout risk
16 January 2026
The global maritime oil transport sector enters 2026 facing a rare convergence of crude oversupply, record newbuild deliveries and the potential easing of several geopolitical disruptions that have shaped trade flows since 2022
15 January 2026
Rebuilding industry, energy dominance and lower energy costs are key goals that remain at odds in 2026
14 January 2026
Chavez’s socialist reforms boosted state control but pushed knowledge and capital out of the sector, opening the way for the US shale revolution







