Newsletters | Request Trial | Log in | Advertise | Digital Issue   |   Search
  • Upstream
  • Midstream & Downstream
  • Gas & LNG
  • Trading & Markets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Geopolitics
  • Podcasts
Search
Justin Jacobs
12 September 2016
Follow @PetroleumEcon
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

Gulf of Mexico producers think small

Megaprojects have fallen out of fashion and cheaper tieback developments are in. It’s enough to keep the region’s output growing, for now

The downturn has exposed a dividing line between producers in the Gulf of Mexico’s (GoM) deep waters: those who own the infrastructure to get oil out of the ground and those who don’t. Few companies are in the mood to spend. Chevron has shelved its Buckskin and Moccasins deep-water production hub development while BP has hit the pause button on its second Mad Dog floating-production hub. The development model of choice is the cheaper option of tying back discoveries to existing hubs, which typically produce well below their nameplate capacity. Connecting a field to existing infrastructure can knock about $10 a barrel off a project’s breakeven price compared to new infrastructure, reckons IHS

Also in this section
Outlook 2026: Grand plan for offshore leasing should give boost to US Gulf
24 December 2025
As activity in the US Gulf has stagnated at a lower level, the government is taking steps to encourage fresh exploration and bolster field development work
Outlook 2026: Revitalising Syria’s oil and gas sector – A new chapter
Outlook 2026
23 December 2025
The new government has brought stability and security to the country, with the door now open to international investment
Outlook 2026: LNG markets and the overhang
Outlook 2026
23 December 2025
A third wave of LNG supply is coming, and with it a likely oversupply of the fuel by 2028
Outlook 2026: Energy realism regains the initiative from energy idealism
Outlook 2026
22 December 2025
Weakening climate resolve in the developed world and rapidly growing demand in developing countries means peak oil is still a long way away

Share PDF with colleagues

COPYRIGHT NOTICE: PDF sharing is permitted internally for Petroleum Economist Gold Members only. Usage of this PDF is restricted by <%= If(IsLoggedIn, User.CompanyName, "")%>’s agreement with Petroleum Economist – exceeding the terms of your licence by forwarding outside of the company or placing on any external network is considered a breach of copyright. Such instances are punishable by fines of up to US$1,500 per infringement
Send

Forward article Link

Send
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Project Data
Maps
Podcasts
Social Links
Featured Video
Home
  • About us
  • Subscribe
  • Reaching your audience
  • PE Store
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws © 2025 The Petroleum Economist Ltd
Cookie Settings
;

Search