Newsletters | Request Trial | Log in | Advertise | Digital Issue   |   Search
  • Upstream
  • Midstream & Downstream
  • Gas & LNG
  • Trading & Markets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Geopolitics
  • Podcasts
Search
Related Articles
IOCs plot risky Libya return
Despite the continuing threat that the country’s security situation could implode, oil firms are keen to get going again
Angola: short-cycle oil gains but gas travails?
The country’s government may have different upstream development priorities to IOCs, with particular impact on the gas sector
Sturgeon omits Cambo from conference speech
No mention of the potential UKCS development in Scottish leader’s address to her party
Outlook 2022: A ‘just’ or ‘just in time’ transition for the UK North Sea?
For over 200 hundred years, the world has relied on fossil fuels for affordable, reliable energy. How does it get to an economy based on greener energy without triggering an adverse reaction?
Flaring risk for Hurricane
Too much gas could accelerate decommissioning of key remaining asset
Norwegian independents diverge on Barents
Aker BP gives up on Arctic exploration, but Lundin expands its presence
OGA takes aim at Elgin-Franklin laggards
The UK upstream regulator is unhappy at partners in the field dragging their feet on the sale of ExxonMobil’s stake
Greenpeace makes further UK anti-oil protest after court defeat
The beleaguered E&P sector can breathe easier after legal ruling against the environmental NGO. But it has taken its message directly to the heart of the political establishment
‘Gas crisis’ brings UKCS supply into focus
The UK’s vulnerability to high international prices may offer an opportunity to remake the argument for domestic production
Equinor promises more Norwegian gas
The supplier hails expanded Troll and Oseberg production permits. But the latter is already far exceeding its quota
Norway UK TotalEnergies Shell OMV Gazprom
17 December 2018
Follow @PetroleumEcon
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

Small players drive a revival in the North Sea

Norway and the UK showed increasing appeal for E&P firms in 2018, with M&A moves propelling investment into the North Sea—but Brexit was a concern for some in the UK side of the play

Western Europe's offshore sector proved something of a magnet for E&P in 2018. According to a recent report from the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD), the 10 wildcat wells drilled during first-half 2018 already have found more new crude—a median estimate of 330mn boe—offshore Norway than was found by 24 wildcats during all of 2017. A wave of mergers and asset consolidations firmed up investment prospects for an offshore sector eager to stem future production declines. In October, Gazprom abandoned plans to swap assets with Austria's OMV, who agreed to buy a 24.98pc stake in the 4A and 5A phases at Achimov for an undisclosed cash sum. Norway's energy ministry had expressed reservatio

Also in this section
Do not underplay China’s long-term gas growth narrative
6 June 2025
A subdued market amid global trade tensions is just an aberration in gas’ upward trajectory
Woodside adopts considered approach to Louisiana LNG
6 June 2025
CEO Meg O’Neill explains the virtue of patience in offtake discussions amid tariff tensions
India’s oil demand looks to EV threat
6 June 2025
Two wheels rather than four appear to be the biggest game-changer for India’s road oil use
Canada’s energy superpower ambition
5 June 2025
The new government is talking and thinking big, and there are credible reasons to believe it is more than just grandstanding

Share PDF with colleagues

Rich Text Editor, message-text
Editor toolbarsBasic Styles Bold ItalicParagraph Insert/Remove Numbered List Insert/Remove Bulleted List Decrease Indent Increase IndentLinks Link Unlinkabout About CKEditor
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: PDF sharing is permitted internally for Petroleum Economist Gold Members only. Usage of this PDF is restricted by <%= If(IsLoggedIn, User.CompanyName, "")%>’s agreement with Petroleum Economist – exceeding the terms of your licence by forwarding outside of the company or placing on any external network is considered a breach of copyright. Such instances are punishable by fines of up to US$1,500 per infringement
Send

Forward article Link

Rich Text Editor, txt-link-message
Editor toolbarsBasic Styles Bold ItalicParagraph Insert/Remove Numbered List Insert/Remove Bulleted List Decrease Indent Increase IndentLinks Link Unlinkabout About CKEditor
Send
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Project Data
Maps
Podcasts
Social Links
Featured Video
Home
  • About us
  • Subscribe
  • Reaching your audience
  • PE Store
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws © 2025 The Petroleum Economist Ltd
Cookie Settings
;

Search

  • Upstream
  • Midstream & Downstream
  • Gas & LNG
  • Trading & Markets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Geopolitics
  • Podcasts
Search