Newsletters | Request Trial | Log in | Advertise | Digital Issue   |   Search
  • CCUS
  • Cap & Trade Markets
  • Voluntary Markets & Offsets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Net Zero Strategies
  • Podcasts
Search
Related Articles
CBL exchange eyes growing share of offset trade
Exchange traded volumes rising as voluntary carbon market matures, CBL’s parent company Xpansiv tells Carbon Economist
EU ETS revisions close to becoming law
Final shape of the law endorsed by European Parliament with only EU Council endorsement remaining
Nature-based carbon offset momentum defies critics
A recent trend towards offset crediting at a jurisdictional level is raising funds at a much larger scale than traditional project-based programmes
Offset oversupply threatens carbon removal tech
Surplus offsets in voluntary carbon market could depress prices to 2050 and deter investment in more expensive removal methods, says BloombergNEF
Offsets standards body refutes media’s Redd+ claims
Studies underpinning recent reports are flawed, according to technical review published by Verra
Core carbon principles could boost voluntary market
Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market to launch finalised Core Carbon Principles for credit programmes and projects, the body’s chair tells Carbon Economist
Voluntary market set to embrace removals
Carbon-removal technologies to gain market share as companies fret over quality of credits generated by avoidance projects, according to Shell and BCG
Alaska looks to tap carbon markets
US state’s governor proposes legislation to support expansion of CCS and generation of tradeable offsets
Brazil’s carbon markets to grow under Lula
Incoming president faces a series of decisions on legacy legislation that could provide impetus for domestic ETS and offset markets
EU reaches agreement on ETS revision
New scheme for transport and buildings paired with tighter cap in existing system
Carbon offsets including nature-based solutions are increasingly viewed as a last resort
Carbon offsets ETS
Mark Battersby
25 March 2021
Follow @PetroleumEcon
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

Investors unimpressed by carbon offsets

Asset managers and institutional investors are looking past largely unregulated means of reducing emissions to companies implementing science-based targets

Investors are increasingly viewing the way non-energy companies are using carbon offsets to voluntarily decarbonise, often to hit net-zero targets, with a high degree of scepticism. A key issue is that carbon offsets are largely unregulated whereas the cap-and-trade schemes, such as the EU ETS, used by energy companies, utilities and related businesses are highly regulated. Eoin Fahy, chief economist and head of responsible Investing at KBI Global Investors, highlights this point, arguing that cap-and-trade schemes such as the EU ETS are “well regarded” by investors, “although in truth, from a theoretical economics point of view, a carbon tax would be preferable, while often politically much

Also in this section
US renewables receive unfair advantage
30 April 2025
State administrations are using a flawed metric to justify green energy projects
Letter on hydrogen: Electric shock
29 April 2025
Spain’s unprecedented blackout highlighted the risk for green hydrogen producers with exposure to Europe’s creaking power grids
Major UK CCS project set for lift-off as Eni wins state funding
24 April 2025
Liverpool Bay project on track for 2028 startup as Italian energy company reaches financial close with government for CO₂ transport and storage network
Shipping GHG deal ‘a framework to build upon’
21 April 2025
Agreement on a two-tier emissions trading scheme does not go far enough to meet IMO GHG reduction targets, say observers

Share PDF with colleagues

Rich Text Editor, message-text
Editor toolbarsBasic Styles Bold ItalicParagraph Insert/Remove Numbered List Insert/Remove Bulleted List Decrease Indent Increase IndentLinks Link Unlinkabout About CKEditor
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: PDF sharing is permitted internally for Petroleum Economist Gold Members only. Usage of this PDF is restricted by <%= If(IsLoggedIn, User.CompanyName, "")%>’s agreement with Petroleum Economist – exceeding the terms of your licence by forwarding outside of the company or placing on any external network is considered a breach of copyright. Such instances are punishable by fines of up to US$1,500 per infringement
Send

Forward article Link

Rich Text Editor, txt-link-message
Editor toolbarsBasic Styles Bold ItalicParagraph Insert/Remove Numbered List Insert/Remove Bulleted List Decrease Indent Increase IndentLinks Link Unlinkabout About CKEditor
Send
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Project Data
Maps
Podcasts
Social Links
Featured Video
Home
  • About us
  • Subscribe
  • Reaching your audience
  • PE Store
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws © 2025 The Petroleum Economist Ltd
Cookie Settings
;

Search

  • CCUS
  • Cap & Trade Markets
  • Voluntary Markets & Offsets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Net Zero Strategies
  • Podcasts
Search