US renewables receive unfair advantage
State administrations are using a flawed metric to justify green energy projects
State governments in the US are pushing a green thumb on the energy policy scale. Cost-benefit studies commissioned by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, for example, determined that the benefits of several proposed (and recently cancelled by the developers’) offshore wind projects were twice their costs, despite those projects’ contractual purchase prices for electricity that were 3–4 times higher than wholesale market prices. The reason: the estimated reductions in carbon emissions accounted for 60% of the total benefits. However, the state used a flawed measurement, the social cost of carbon (SCC), to calculate the benefits of CO₂ reductions and justify projects that, if built, wou
Also in this section
3 July 2025
European Commission introduces new flexibilities for member states to ease compliance with headline goal
1 July 2025
Supportive government policy, deforestation threat and economic opportunity drive forward the region’s monetisation of forest carbon
27 June 2025
TotalEnergies’ delayed FID for its Venus project will likely set back first oil, but Windhoek has other irons in the fire
26 June 2025
Last year was one of records for renewables but also for oil, gas and coal, as the energy transition progresses in an increasingly uneven way, according to the Energy Institute’s latest annual report
