US renewables receive unfair advantage
State administrations are using a flawed metric to justify green energy projects
State governments in the US are pushing a green thumb on the energy policy scale. Cost-benefit studies commissioned by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, for example, determined that the benefits of several proposed (and recently cancelled by the developers’) offshore wind projects were twice their costs, despite those projects’ contractual purchase prices for electricity that were 3–4 times higher than wholesale market prices. The reason: the estimated reductions in carbon emissions accounted for 60% of the total benefits. However, the state used a flawed measurement, the social cost of carbon (SCC), to calculate the benefits of CO₂ reductions and justify projects that, if built, wou
Also in this section
22 July 2025
Sinopec hosts launch of global sharing platform as Beijing looks to draw on international investors and expertise
22 July 2025
Africa’s most populous nation puts cap-and-trade and voluntary markets at the centre of its emerging strategy to achieve net zero by 2060
17 July 2025
Oil and gas companies will face penalties if they fail to reach the EU’s binding CO₂ injection targets for 2030, but they could also risk building underused and unprofitable CCS infrastructure
9 July 2025
Latin American country plans a cap-and-trade system and supports the scale-up of CCS as it prepares to host COP30
