Newsletters | Request Trial | Log in | Advertise | Digital Issue   |   Search
  • CCUS
  • Cap & Trade Markets
  • Voluntary Markets & Offsets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Net Zero Strategies
  • Podcasts
Search
Tom Young
15 August 2024
Follow @PetroleumEcon
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

Voluntary markets need improved transparency to restore trust

Number of transactions in voluntary carbon offsets market has fallen dramatically since critical media reports, says Climate Crisis Advisory Group

There is a critical need for enhanced scientific rigour and better transparency in the operation of voluntary carbon markets (VCMs), according to a new report from independent thinktank Climate Crisis Advisory Group (CCAG). VCMs have taken a reputational hit following a series of investigative newspaper reports in 2023 claiming that many credits sold did not represent genuine carbon reductions. “The number of transactions and the money going into the system basically halved in the 12 months following these reports,” Mark Maslin, a professor at UCL and one of the authors of the CCAG report, told Carbon Economist in an interview. “But we have to pursue every solution there is to try and get gl

Also in this section
Letter from Europe: Western retreat raises doubts over climate leadership
Opinion
6 November 2025
After years of pursuing ideologically driven climate leadership, Western powers are now stepping back under mounting political pressure and rising populist opposition—prompting concern essential climate action could be sidelined
The changing economics of CCS
17 October 2025
The business case for CCS is strengthening as costs decline, but deployment must accelerate to align with credible net-zero scenarios
Gulf Energy Excellence Awards® 2025 winners honoured at Houston gala
17 October 2025
The black-tie gala recognised the energy industry’s leading innovations and thought leaders from across the value chain
Letter from London: Occidental’s oil-led defence of DAC
15 October 2025
Company warns against potential withdrawal of federal funding for emerging technology as it eyes key role for CO₂ in boosting both conventional and shale oil recovery in US

Share PDF with colleagues

Rich Text Editor, message-text
Editor toolbarsBasic Styles Bold ItalicParagraph Insert/Remove Numbered List Insert/Remove Bulleted List Decrease Indent Increase IndentLinks Link Unlinkabout About CKEditor
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: PDF sharing is permitted internally for Petroleum Economist Gold Members only. Usage of this PDF is restricted by <%= If(IsLoggedIn, User.CompanyName, "")%>’s agreement with Petroleum Economist – exceeding the terms of your licence by forwarding outside of the company or placing on any external network is considered a breach of copyright. Such instances are punishable by fines of up to US$1,500 per infringement
Send

Forward article Link

Rich Text Editor, txt-link-message
Editor toolbarsBasic Styles Bold ItalicParagraph Insert/Remove Numbered List Insert/Remove Bulleted List Decrease Indent Increase IndentLinks Link Unlinkabout About CKEditor
Send
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Project Data
Maps
Podcasts
Social Links
Featured Video
Home
  • About us
  • Subscribe
  • Reaching your audience
  • PE Store
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws © 2025 The Petroleum Economist Ltd
Cookie Settings
;

Search

  • CCUS
  • Cap & Trade Markets
  • Voluntary Markets & Offsets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Net Zero Strategies
  • Podcasts
Search