Newsletters | Request Trial | Log in | Advertise | Digital Issue   |   Search
  • Upstream
  • Midstream & Downstream
  • Gas & LNG
  • Trading & Markets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Geopolitics
  • Podcasts
Search
Related Articles
ADNOC’s Australia avoidance
The Middle East NOC’s decision to exit Santos signals changing rules for Australian gas investors
Australia gas security faces fitness test
Reassessment of the country’s export-facing gas policy coincides with worsening domestic market backdrop
ADNOC targets Santos in big LNG push
The takeover, if it gets the all-clear from regulators and other government authorities, would propel XRG and its parent firm ADNOC into the top tier of global LNG players
Australia’s LNG flashpoint
Scapegoating foreign buyers will not solve country’s gas shortages
Australia’s post-election energy priorities
With the gas industry’s staunchest advocates and opponents taking brutal blows, the sector looks like treading a path of insipid indifference
Australia’s changing gas risks
Australia’s East Coast Gas projections for a supply shortfall have been pushed further out, but the challenge to meet evolving gas demand and the shifting assumptions around the fundamentals remain just as stark
Australia faces up to Victoria’s gas folly
As gas supplies dwindle, LNG becomes the only viable solution in a state that has focused on transition
Australia’s unresolved fuel security risks
Lack of competitiveness in refining sector and underbaked oil reserves threaten long-term stability
Woodside makes US LNG push with Tellurian acquisition
The Australian firm’s purchase represents a significant move into US LNG by an international player and will boost the planned Driftwood project after years of uncertainty
Australia’s East Coast market running out of time
Looming supply shortfalls will force some difficult political decisions
LNG ship taking on cargo in WA
Australia Western Australia Woodside Pluto LNG
Andrew Kemp
24 June 2021
Follow @PetroleumEcon
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

Woodside commits to Pluto LNG carbon reduction

The Australian firm plans to achieve net-zero emissions from its Pluto LNG project in Western Australia by 2050

Australia’s Woodside Energy has set an interim target of abating 30pc of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from its Pluto LNG project by 2030 and 100pc by 2050. These targets deal only with the facility’s direct and indirect emissions (scope one and two) and does not include emissions generated when the exported LNG is consumed (scope three). Woodside’s targets are part of its revised Pluto Greenhouse Gas Abatement Program (GGAP), which was updated to account for the planned addition of a second liquefaction train. The Western Australia (WA) government has approved the plan. The company aims to reach FID on developing the Scarborough gas field, which will underpin the second train, before the e

Also in this section
Outlook 2026: Grand plan for offshore leasing should give boost to US Gulf
24 December 2025
As activity in the US Gulf has stagnated at a lower level, the government is taking steps to encourage fresh exploration and bolster field development work
Outlook 2026: Revitalising Syria’s oil and gas sector – A new chapter
Outlook 2026
23 December 2025
The new government has brought stability and security to the country, with the door now open to international investment
Outlook 2026: LNG markets and the overhang
Outlook 2026
23 December 2025
A third wave of LNG supply is coming, and with it a likely oversupply of the fuel by 2028
Outlook 2026: Energy realism regains the initiative from energy idealism
Outlook 2026
22 December 2025
Weakening climate resolve in the developed world and rapidly growing demand in developing countries means peak oil is still a long way away

Share PDF with colleagues

COPYRIGHT NOTICE: PDF sharing is permitted internally for Petroleum Economist Gold Members only. Usage of this PDF is restricted by <%= If(IsLoggedIn, User.CompanyName, "")%>’s agreement with Petroleum Economist – exceeding the terms of your licence by forwarding outside of the company or placing on any external network is considered a breach of copyright. Such instances are punishable by fines of up to US$1,500 per infringement
Send

Forward article Link

Send
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Project Data
Maps
Podcasts
Social Links
Featured Video
Home
  • About us
  • Subscribe
  • Reaching your audience
  • PE Store
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws © 2025 The Petroleum Economist Ltd
Cookie Settings
;

Search