A tale of two regulatory landscapes: the UK and Norway
The stark contrasts between the UK and Norway demonstrate how policy stability can shape the long-term trajectory of a mature basin
The UK and Norway share the geology of the North Sea, but their oil and gas regulatory climates could scarcely be more different: where Norway provides consistency and long-term certainty, the UK has veered through cycles of policy instability from government to government. Mixed signals UK authorities have sent very mixed signals about the future of North Sea oil and gas over recent years. Just a decade ago, the government was strongly promoting investment, for example through tax allowances that spurred the development of several 100m bl projects. Then in 2019, the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) regulator temporarily paused licensing to assess whether its policies were in line with
Also in this section
18 December 2025
Brazil, Guyana and Argentina to lead additional crude supply increases, but the rest of the region remains patchy
17 December 2025
Companies will continue shifting more towards gas, where the outlook is stronger
17 December 2025
The stark contrasts between the UK and Norway demonstrate how policy stability can shape the long-term trajectory of a mature basin
16 December 2025
How New Zealand highlights the importance of a clear, consistent and considered approach to oil and gas






