A tale of two regulatory landscapes: the UK and Norway
The stark contrasts between the UK and Norway demonstrate how policy stability can shape the long-term trajectory of a mature basin
The UK and Norway share the geology of the North Sea, but their oil and gas regulatory climates could scarcely be more different: where Norway provides consistency and long-term certainty, the UK has veered through cycles of policy instability from government to government. Mixed signals UK authorities have sent very mixed signals about the future of North Sea oil and gas over recent years. Just a decade ago, the government was strongly promoting investment, for example through tax allowances that spurred the development of several 100m bl projects. Then in 2019, the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) regulator temporarily paused licensing to assess whether its policies were in line with
Also in this section
2 April 2026
Alongside a rapid continued build-out of renewables, China’s latest five-year plan stresses the value of domestic hydrocarbon production for energy security and calls for increased Russian gas imports
2 April 2026
The government is taking important steps to revive domestic production, lift investment and benefit from the geopolitical crisis even if more needs to be done in the longer term
1 April 2026
Golden Pass’s startup offers QatarEnergy a timely boost but may also force a difficult choice between honouring disrupted contracts and capitalising on soaring spot LNG prices
1 April 2026
It is not a case of if or when, but the length and magnitude of economic damage from elevated oil prices
