A tale of two regulatory landscapes: the UK and Norway
The stark contrasts between the UK and Norway demonstrate how policy stability can shape the long-term trajectory of a mature basin
The UK and Norway share the geology of the North Sea, but their oil and gas regulatory climates could scarcely be more different: where Norway provides consistency and long-term certainty, the UK has veered through cycles of policy instability from government to government. Mixed signals UK authorities have sent very mixed signals about the future of North Sea oil and gas over recent years. Just a decade ago, the government was strongly promoting investment, for example through tax allowances that spurred the development of several 100m bl projects. Then in 2019, the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) regulator temporarily paused licensing to assess whether its policies were in line with
Also in this section
22 April 2026
The failure of OMV Petrom’s keenly watched exploration campaign at Bulgaria’s Han Asparuh block highlights the Black Sea’s uneven track record, despite major successes like Neptun Deep and Sakarya
22 April 2026
Sustained strikes on ports, terminals and refineries are testing the resilience of Russia’s oil export system, yet rapid repairs, rerouting and surging prices mean the campaign has yet to deliver a decisive blow
21 April 2026
After overcoming a COVID-induced demand collapse with several years of successful market management, geopolitical events have conspired to provide the pact’s biggest test to date
21 April 2026
The regime’s policy of using nuclear ambiguity as a deterrent may have failed but it has realised it has other cards to play, while its neighbours are reappraising their approach to security
