Newsletters | Request Trial | Log in | Advertise | Digital Issue   |   Search
  • Upstream
  • Midstream & Downstream
  • Gas & LNG
  • Trading & Markets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Geopolitics
  • Podcasts
Search
Related Articles
Letter from London: Shipping GHG targets not all plain sailing
The IMO’s ambitious emission goals are still reliant on as-yet unproven technology
More change ahead for the shipping sector
An unwinding of some Covid-related effects might challenge VLSFO’s initial IMO 2020 win
Liberian Registry hits out at proposed EU ETS shipping extension
The world’s second-largest vessel registering service opposes what it sees as European overreach
IMO alters competing fuels’ price dynamics
Buyers of marine fuels may need to think harder about their decision-making when considering what to put in their vessels
Middle East expansion further clouds global refining picture
Challenges to refiners are myriad. Another boost in Mid-East Gulf capacity brings more complexity
The IMO 2020 story so far
The new rules on sulphur content of shipping fuels came into force this year. This article revisits 2018 predictions to see what turned out as expected and what surprised
European refiners lag on IMO 2020
The continent’s crude processors are playing catch-up following the introduction of IMO 2020 regulations on sulphur content in marine fuel
China targets Singapore bunkering
Chinese tax reform will trigger a gradual shift in the bunker fuel market away from Asia’s dominant hub
IMO 2020 promises widespread disruption
Large-scale changes in refinery operations will be just one of the major changes the new regulations will bring to the energy landscape
Marine fuel regulation change to create African winners and losers
The African upstream may be well placed to benefit from IMO 2020, but it poses significant wider risks to the region
IMO 2020
Mark Waddington
6 January 2020
Follow @PetroleumEcon
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

Refiners over a barrel?

Challenges and costs increase as ageing oil fields reach the ‘babushka’ stage

When the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) set in motion the changes to its international convention for the prevention of pollution from ships, or Marpol, to move the sulphur standard for marine bunkers from 3.5pc to 0.5pc, it probably believed that the timeframe would smooth the path for the change that is taking place on 1 January 2020.  But, in reality, that neither oil refining companies nor ship owners have invested heavily enough should not be a surprise, given the costs entailed and the uncertainty of any investment paying back.  Meeting the change in sulphur specification is not simple and prices are responding to the distortion that is being created in global supply/demand

Also in this section
Look again at African oil and gas investment
17 June 2025
Sound development planning is essential in this diverse and rapidly evolving region
The long road to African energy finance
16 June 2025
The launch of the much-needed yet oft-delayed Africa Energy Bank remains shrouded in questions and funding constraints, but its potential is clear
Azerbaijan enjoys rare upstream FID
16 June 2025
BP and partners have reached a $2.9b FID on a new phase at Shah Deniz, but slow progress on other gas projects is attributed to a lack of European support
Saudi Arabia and Russia pull OPEC+ in different directions
13 June 2025
The two oil heavyweights’ diverging fiscal considerations are straining unity within the group

Share PDF with colleagues

Rich Text Editor, message-text
Editor toolbarsBasic Styles Bold ItalicParagraph Insert/Remove Numbered List Insert/Remove Bulleted List Decrease Indent Increase IndentLinks Link Unlinkabout About CKEditor
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: PDF sharing is permitted internally for Petroleum Economist Gold Members only. Usage of this PDF is restricted by <%= If(IsLoggedIn, User.CompanyName, "")%>’s agreement with Petroleum Economist – exceeding the terms of your licence by forwarding outside of the company or placing on any external network is considered a breach of copyright. Such instances are punishable by fines of up to US$1,500 per infringement
Send

Forward article Link

Rich Text Editor, txt-link-message
Editor toolbarsBasic Styles Bold ItalicParagraph Insert/Remove Numbered List Insert/Remove Bulleted List Decrease Indent Increase IndentLinks Link Unlinkabout About CKEditor
Send
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Project Data
Maps
Podcasts
Social Links
Featured Video
Home
  • About us
  • Subscribe
  • Reaching your audience
  • PE Store
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws © 2025 The Petroleum Economist Ltd
Cookie Settings
;

Search

  • Upstream
  • Midstream & Downstream
  • Gas & LNG
  • Trading & Markets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Geopolitics
  • Podcasts
Search