Newsletters | Request Trial | Log in | Advertise | Digital Issue   |   Search
  • Upstream
  • Midstream & Downstream
  • Gas & LNG
  • Trading & Markets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Geopolitics
  • Podcasts
Search
Gary Park
Vancouver
20 April 2011
Follow @PetroleumEcon
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

US holds firm over Keystone XL

Oil-sands pipeline decision a step nearer as report lodged with EPA; study claims over environmental impact stoke green ire

THE US State Department says “thousands of comments on a wide variety of topics” have not changed its view of the need for TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline from the Alberta oil sands to the Gulf of Mexico, or the project’s potential environmental impact. A 320-page report, requested by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), highlights the country’s demand for “stable and reliable” crude supplies from Canada to ease the reliance on imported crude feedstock for Gulf coast refineries. It also seizes on arguments that the rejection of XL will give added impetus to plans for exporting oil-sands crude to Asian markets, leaving global greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions unchanged. Emissions cla

Also in this section
Learning from oil’s supercycle miss
5 December 2025
Mistaken assumptions around an oil bull run that never happened are a warning over the talk of a supply glut
Explainer: What do Russia’s oil giants own overseas?
4 December 2025
Time is running out for Lukoil and Rosneft to divest international assets that will be mostly rendered useless to them when the US sanctions deadline arrives in mid-December
Letter from Saudi Arabia: US-Saudi energy ties enter a new phase
Opinion
3 December 2025
Aramco’s pursuit of $30b in US gas partnerships marks a strategic pivot. The US gains capital and certainty; Saudi Arabia gains access, flexibility and a new export future
Letter from London: Oil’s golden triangle
Opinion
2 December 2025
The interplay between OPEC+, China and the US will define oil markets throughout 2026

Share PDF with colleagues

COPYRIGHT NOTICE: PDF sharing is permitted internally for Petroleum Economist Gold Members only. Usage of this PDF is restricted by <%= If(IsLoggedIn, User.CompanyName, "")%>’s agreement with Petroleum Economist – exceeding the terms of your licence by forwarding outside of the company or placing on any external network is considered a breach of copyright. Such instances are punishable by fines of up to US$1,500 per infringement
Send

Forward article Link

Send
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Project Data
Maps
Podcasts
Social Links
Featured Video
Home
  • About us
  • Subscribe
  • Reaching your audience
  • PE Store
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws © 2025 The Petroleum Economist Ltd
Cookie Settings
;

Search