Lithium is a key mineral for the transition
Avoiding old geopolitical paradigms for new energy challenges
The US needs critical minerals for the energy transition, but its strategy for securing supplies should not mirror its approach to fossil fuels
I joined a workshop in early April on the geopolitics of the energy transition, hosted by nonprofit the Stanley Center for Peace and Security and climate change thinktank E3G. Although the workshop touched on a wide range of challenges, those related to critical raw minerals (CRM) stood out. Washington has clearly woken up to the need to secure CRM, but it risks overlaying old frameworks onto new challenges. Specifically, it risks overplaying great power rivalry and treating CRM like fossil fuels. At stake is the pace and extent of the energy transition, and the commercial opportunities it should yield. For context, the workshop laid out a few key points. First, that the transition to clean
Also in this section
3 September 2025
Binding CO₂ injection targets for oil and gas firms are ill-defined and very unrealistic, oil major tells London CCS summit
2 September 2025
Policymakers acknowledge crucial role for direct air capture and other removal technologies in meeting climate goals
26 August 2025
Merchant storage project off western Norway takes first CO₂ shipment, but government warns of significant cost challenges ahead for CCS
14 August 2025
Innovation is moving at pace in the direct air capture sector, but will costs fall quickly enough to make it a mainstay of the voluntary carbon market?
