Newsletters | Request Trial | Log in | Advertise | Digital Issue   |   Search
  • Upstream
  • Midstream & Downstream
  • Gas & LNG
  • Trading & Markets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Geopolitics
  • Podcasts
Search
Related Articles
Saudi-US energy ties adapt to multipolar world
Saudi Arabia and US relations can construct a new ‘field of dreams’, but opportunism may be the new rules of the game
A new energy order in the UAE and Saudi Arabia
The two Gulf states are combining fossil fuel production with ambitions to become leaders in low-carbon energy
Fifty years of oil trading
The invisible hand of the market has seen increasing transparency but much more needs to be done to build a better understanding
Australia’s post-election energy priorities
With the gas industry’s staunchest advocates and opponents taking brutal blows, the sector looks like treading a path of insipid indifference
LNG gets political
From China blocking US LNG to Trump demanding that various countries import more of the fuel, the politicisation of LNG is on the rise
Bad omens for Chinese oil demand
Sino-US trade tensions could see crude consumption crumble despite recent buying behaviour
Trump’s LNG metamorphosis
Fast-tracking US project approvals and increased trade pressures have already changed the LNG landscape since Trump came to office, with further transformation ahead
Letter from the US: Oil and gas producers face tax threat
Capping state corporate income tax deductions would reduce energy supplies and raise prices
Letter from Saudi Arabia: Energy, diplomacy and the art of the deal
Saudi Arabia is growing as a geopolitical and diplomatic force amid an increasingly fractured world
Trump’s energy policy paradox
US consumers are not likely to see gasoline prices fall to Trump’s ‘beautiful number’, at least if the president also wants to encourage more drilling
Opinion
US Politics
Philip K. Verleger
6 December 2024
Follow @PetroleumEcon
Forward article link
Share PDF with colleagues

Letter from the US: Trump’s protectionism threatens oil and gas industry

A trade war may damage US economic growth, with commodity producers the ultimate losers if history is a guide

Donald Trump’s election has pleased everyone in the US oil and gas sector. The individuals and firms celebrating Trump’s promises to reduce regulation and increase domestic oil production should “have been careful what they wished for”, however, because the president-elect also plans to implement an aggressive worldwide trade war. This war will likely proceed even though liberal and conservative economists alike warn that such actions generally depress economic growth. A look at the history books and the post-First/Second World War and Great Depression trade battles illustrate how commodity producers also end up losers. If history repeats, Trump may be touting the return of $1/gal gasoline w

Also in this section
Gas may be bridge fuel for centuries
30 May 2025
Energy majors argue transition debate has started to factor in the complexities of demand shifts and the wider role for gas
Gabon eyes future post-Bongo
29 May 2025
Sovereignty is the watchword for the new government, but there are still upstream opportunities for those willing to work closely with the state
China’s pragmatic coal-to-gas strategy
29 May 2025
A cautious approach to coal-to-gas switching offers lessons to others who are looking to balance cost with cleaner energy
Russia’s implausible gas strategy
28 May 2025
The country may have the resources, but sanctions and a lack of market access make its gas ambitions look very questionable

Share PDF with colleagues

Rich Text Editor, message-text
Editor toolbarsBasic Styles Bold ItalicParagraph Insert/Remove Numbered List Insert/Remove Bulleted List Decrease Indent Increase IndentLinks Link Unlinkabout About CKEditor
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: PDF sharing is permitted internally for Petroleum Economist Gold Members only. Usage of this PDF is restricted by <%= If(IsLoggedIn, User.CompanyName, "")%>’s agreement with Petroleum Economist – exceeding the terms of your licence by forwarding outside of the company or placing on any external network is considered a breach of copyright. Such instances are punishable by fines of up to US$1,500 per infringement
Send

Forward article Link

Rich Text Editor, txt-link-message
Editor toolbarsBasic Styles Bold ItalicParagraph Insert/Remove Numbered List Insert/Remove Bulleted List Decrease Indent Increase IndentLinks Link Unlinkabout About CKEditor
Send
Sign Up For Our Newsletter
Project Data
Maps
Podcasts
Social Links
Featured Video
Home
  • About us
  • Subscribe
  • Reaching your audience
  • PE Store
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact us
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws © 2025 The Petroleum Economist Ltd
Cookie Settings
;

Search

  • Upstream
  • Midstream & Downstream
  • Gas & LNG
  • Trading & Markets
  • Corporate & Finance
  • Geopolitics
  • Podcasts
Search