Letter from Houston: Pragmatism versus rhetoric
The US’ contentious LNG permitting pause has prompted criticism from CEOs and wildly differing interpretations from politicians
Politics tends to be more dramatic and theatrical in the US than in the UK. But does the energy sector benefit from adopting any of that rhetorical flair and aggression? This year’s CERAWeek conference in Houston in March attracted both senior Republican and Democratic politicians, as well as a galaxy of CEOs and industry figures. A key topic of discussion was the federal government’s permitting pause for LNG developments, a move that was broadly—and unsurprisingly—unpopular at the conference but was still described and interpreted in wildly different ways by various speakers and delegates. US energy secretary Jennifer Granholm offered a cheerfully upbeat version of federal policy, emphasisi
Also in this section
16 January 2026
The country’s global energy importance and domestic political fate are interlocked, highlighting its outsized oil and gas powers, and the heightened fallout risk
16 January 2026
The global maritime oil transport sector enters 2026 facing a rare convergence of crude oversupply, record newbuild deliveries and the potential easing of several geopolitical disruptions that have shaped trade flows since 2022
15 January 2026
Rebuilding industry, energy dominance and lower energy costs are key goals that remain at odds in 2026
14 January 2026
Chavez’s socialist reforms boosted state control but pushed knowledge and capital out of the sector, opening the way for the US shale revolution






